CHW103-Locking Service Users Doors Policy

Registration Number: {{org_field_registration_no}}

Locking Service Users’ Doors Policy

Purpose

This policy outlines the care home’s approach to locking service users’ doors, balancing residents’ rights to privacy and freedom with the need for safety and security. It ensures compliance with Care Inspectorate Wales (CIW) requirements and relevant legislation (Mental Capacity Act 2005 and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards – DoLS). The goal is to provide clear guidance so that staff protect service users from harm without infringing on their dignity or liberty.

Scope

Applicability: This policy applies to all staff and volunteers in the home. It covers both residential care and nursing care units, reflecting that the same principles apply in both settings.
Coverage: It addresses locking of internal bedroom doors (individual rooms) and external doors (main entrance/exits) of the care home. The policy is relevant to all service users, including those who can consent to door locking arrangements and those who lack capacity to consent.
Regulatory Basis: As a CIW-registered service in Wales, the home adheres to CIW guidelines and statutory requirements on premises security and resident rights. For example, regulations require that premises be secure from unauthorised access while not unnecessarily restricting individuals’ freedom of movement. This policy also operates within the framework of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and DoLS for any practice that might limit a person’s liberty.

Policy Statement and Principles

We are committed to promoting each service user’s privacy, safety, and rights. The following principles guide all practices regarding locked doors:

Privacy and Dignity: Every service user has the right to privacy in their personal space. Bedroom doors will be fitted with suitable locks, and individuals will be provided with their own keys unless a risk assessment indicates this would be unsafe. Staff must always knock and obtain permission before entering a service user’s room, even if the door is unlocked. The ability to lock one’s door helps protect personal belongings and provides a sense of security and ownership of their space.
Emergency Access: While respecting privacy, the home ensures that staff can always gain access to a locked room in an emergency. All bedroom door locks must allow staff to open them from the outside if needed. Master keys (or an override mechanism) will be readily available to authorized staff for use only in urgent situations (e.g. medical emergency or if a resident is unresponsive behind a locked door). This ensures residents’ safety is not compromised by their use of door locks.
Safety and Security: The home will keep the building secure for the protection of residents. External doors (e.g. front entrance, garden gates) may be kept locked or controlled by keypads/intercoms to prevent unauthorised entry and to protect vulnerable residents from wandering out into danger. CIW standards require that care home premises be secure from unauthorised access. However, any security measures must not unnecessarily restrict a service user’s freedom of movement. We aim to maintain a safe environment while also ensuring that residents who are able and wish to leave the home can do so appropriately.
Individual Consent and Autonomy: Service users who have mental capacity are supported to make their own decisions about door locks. If a resident wishes to have their bedroom door locked or unlocked, or wants to have a key to their room, staff will respect that choice and assist as needed. No service user with capacity will be prevented from exiting the home or locked in against their wishes – they are free to come and go, understanding any risks. Staff may offer guidance or request the person sign in/out for safety, but will not physically stop a capacitated individual from leaving.
Risk Assessment and Care Planning: Any deviation from the usual practice (such as not providing a key, or locking a door for a resident) must be based on a risk assessment. Risks might include the individual’s tendency to lose their key, unsafe use of locks (e.g. risk of locking themselves in and not being able to get out), or wandering into danger. Such cases will be documented in the person’s care plan along with the rationale and any agreed measures. The least restrictive option will always be sought. For instance, if a resident cannot manage a key due to cognitive impairment, staff might keep the key accessible nearby or use alternative security for belongings, rather than outright denying the resident a locked door.
Least Restrictive Practice: In line with the Mental Capacity Act’s principles, if any restrictions on freedom (like locked doors) are considered, staff must ensure there is no less restrictive way to achieve the safety goals . Locking a service user’s door should be a last resort. For example, if a person tends to wander at night into other residents’ rooms, alternatives must be tried before deciding to lock their door. Such alternatives could include allowing the person a later bedtime, having staff redirect or accompany them, or using motion sensors/alarms to alert staff when they leave their room. This approach protects others’ privacy and the individual’s safety without immediately resorting to a lock and key.

Bedroom Door Locking Guidelines

All service users’ bedroom doors will be equipped and managed to uphold privacy while ensuring safety:

Lock Fittings: Each bedroom door is fitted with an appropriate lock that the service user can operate (e.g. lever or card locks for those with limited dexterity if needed). The lock type will take into account the resident’s abilities and disabilities (for instance, avoiding small fiddly keys for someone with arthritis). It is also ensured that staff can override the lock in emergencies (typically via a master key or staff keycard).
Issuing of Keys: Service users will be given their own key to their room by default, promoting a sense of control over their personal space. Staff will explain how to use the lock if needed. A record is kept of which residents hold keys. If a resident does not wish to have a key, or cannot manage one, this will be respected and noted in their care plan.
Exceptions (Risk-Based): A key might not be issued to a resident (or may be held by staff for them) only if a documented risk assessment justifies it. For example, if a person has severe dementia and might lock themselves in and panic or be unable to unlock the door, the MDT (multi-disciplinary team) might decide the resident should not have independent locking. Such decisions must involve the resident (if possible), their family or representatives, and be recorded with reasons. Alternatives like a door alarm (to alert staff if the person exits their room at night) should be considered as less restrictive measures before deciding the person cannot have a lock/key. Any decision to restrict a resident’s access to their door lock will be reviewed regularly in case their abilities or the risk factors change.
Staff Access and Entry: Staff will always knock and identify themselves before entering a service user’s room, even if the door is unlocked. If the door is locked and the resident does not answer, staff should only use the master key if there is legitimate concern (e.g. no response to knocking and the person is known to be inside and possibly in distress). In non-emergency situations, the resident’s permission should be obtained to unlock the door. In an emergency (medical emergency, fire, etc.), staff have the authority to unlock the door without prior consent to ensure the person’s safety. All staff are trained on the location and use of the master keys.
Privacy When Inside: Residents who wish to lock their door when they are inside their room are free to do so (for example, some may feel safer locking the door at night). Staff will discuss with each resident their preferences for night time – some may want staff to enter freely for checks, while others prefer a locked door unless they call for help. These preferences are respected unless a specific risk requires otherwise (e.g. a high risk of falls might necessitate staff having access for checks – in which case this is agreed in the care plan). Even when a room is locked from inside, staff can unlock from outside in an emergency. Residents will be reassured that staff carrying a master key will not use it to barge in without good cause.
Lockable Storage: In addition to door locks, each service user is provided with lockable storage (drawers or a safe) for their valuables and medications, with a key they can keep, unless there is a reason documented in the care plan for not doing so. This reduces the need for locking the whole room simply to secure small valuables.

External Door Locking and Building Security

The care home must remain a secure and safe environment, while also being a home that residents can freely move within and exit when they choose (if they have the capacity or appropriate supervision). Key guidelines for external doors (e.g. main entrances, exits to outside) are:

Controlled Entry: External doors may be kept locked or secured (for example, via a keypad code, key fob, or buzzer system) to prevent strangers from entering and to protect residents from wandering off unknowingly. This is an important security measure, in line with regulatory requirements to keep the premises safe and secure from unauthorised access. Visitors might be asked to ring a bell or use an intercom for entry.
Resident Egress (Freedom to Leave): Residents will not be trapped inside the home. Those who have capacity to go outside independently will be given the door code or a key, or staff will unlock the door for them promptly upon request. They are encouraged to inform staff when they go out for safety reasons, but they will not be physically prevented or delayed from leaving. For residents who require assistance or supervision to go out (due to mobility or health issues), staff will arrange to accompany them or otherwise facilitate their wish to go outside in a timely manner. The principle is that the level of security is tailored so it does not unnecessarily restrict an individual’s freedom of movement.
Supervision of Exits: For residents who are cognitively impaired or assessed as lacking awareness of dangers (for instance, a person with dementia who might walk out into a busy road without understanding the risk), the home’s locked external doors act as a safeguard. However, this is recognized as a form of restraint or restriction. In such cases, staff must ensure that the restriction is care-planned, necessary for safety, and reviewed regularly. When a capable resident and an incapable resident are together at an exit, staff will manage the situation so that the capable person can leave (by escorting the other person away or ensuring they don’t also exit unsafely). The home will not implement a “one-size-fits-all” lockdown; we will individualize approaches as much as possible.
Keypad/Lock Management: The codes or keys for external doors are kept secure. Only staff and authorized persons (including certain residents, as above) will have them. Codes will be changed periodically or as needed for security. Staff must not divulge door codes to any unauthorised person.
Fire Safety Considerations: Any locked external door will be configured to allow quick emergency exit. For example, doors may have an automatic release in case of fire alarm, or staff on duty carry keys at all times to open them. The locking mechanism will meet fire safety regulations so that no resident’s ability to evacuate in an emergency is impeded. Regular drills will include scenarios of unlocking doors. (Note: These fire safety measures are addressed in detail in the Fire Safety Policy, but are mentioned here to reinforce that locked doors will not compromise emergency egress.)
Night Security: During nighttime hours, for general security, the front door and other exits will typically remain locked. A staff member (e.g. night supervisor) holds the key and will respond to any request for exit even at night. If a resident who is able to make an informed choice wishes to step outside in the night (an uncommon scenario), staff will accommodate this if it’s safe (e.g. accompany them for a walk, etc.). Otherwise, staff may suggest alternatives for safety at night, but will not unjustly confine a competent person.
Monitoring and Alarms: The home may employ door alarms or alert systems on external doors, especially in dementia units. For instance, an alarm may sound if an exit door is opened, alerting staff to respond. This is a less restrictive measure than physically preventing exit, as staff can then assess who is at the door – allowing exit for those who can safely go, and gently redirecting those who cannot. Any use of such systems will be outlined in the home’s security procedures and explained to residents and families. We do not use any form of covert locking; all residents and families are made aware of the external door security measures in place.

Safeguarding Considerations and Capacity

There are specific circumstances where locking a service user’s door (either their bedroom or the external doors of the home) might be considered necessary for safety. In all such cases, the home will carefully balance the individual’s rights with the need to protect them or others from harm:

Safeguarding Individuals from Others: If a service user is at risk from other residents or visitors (for example, if another resident has aggressive behaviours or tends to enter others’ rooms inappropriately), the at-risk person may wish to keep their door locked for protection. Staff will support them in doing so and ensure a care plan notes this preference. Additionally, staff will address the source of risk (e.g. supervise the wanderer or provide them with engaging activities) so that one resident does not have to remain behind a locked door due to another’s behavior. Every effort is made to maintain a safe communal environment.
Protecting Residents from Hazards: In some cases, a resident might lack hazard awareness (e.g. walking out into traffic, leaving the stove on, etc.). Rather than locking them in their room, the care plan will explore safer solutions (like closer supervision, environmental modifications). Locking someone in a room as a means of restraint is never a standard practice and would only be considered in extreme emergency situations as a short-term measure (e.g. while waiting for professional help during a severe behavioral crisis, and only if it’s immediately necessary to prevent harm). Even then, it triggers an urgent review, and appropriate authorizations (like an urgent DoLS) must be sought if not already in place.
Mental Capacity and DoLS: When a service user lacks capacity to understand or consent to a door being locked (either their own room or the home’s exits), any decision to impose such a restriction must follow the Mental Capacity Act 2005 framework. A best interest decision meeting will be held involving family or an advocate, and it will consider the person’s past and present wishes and any less restrictive alternatives. If the outcome is that locking the door (thus restricting the person’s freedom of movement) is necessary for their safety, this likely constitutes a deprivation of liberty. We will not deprive any service user of their liberty for care purposes without lawful authority. Therefore, the home will apply for a DoLS authorisation from the local authority in these cases. For example, locking the front door to prevent a confused resident from wandering onto a busy road is only permissible if it’s in their best interests and a DoLS authorisation is obtaineds. The Mental Capacity Act allows such restraint only with the proper safeguards and authorisation in place.
DoLS Process: If a resident is identified as possibly being under continuous supervision and not free to leave due to locked doors or supervision, the manager (Managing Authority under DoLS) will make a DoLS referral to the Supervisory Body (the local authority). While awaiting authorization, an urgent DoLS can be put in place by management for up to 7 days (renewable for another 7) if immediate restrictions are needed for safety. The home will always notify CIW of any DoLS applications or outcomes as required. All staff are briefed on who in the home is subject to a DoLS so that they understand the legal implications of any restrictions in place.
Review and Reduction of Restrictions: Any care plan that includes a locked door or similar restriction is reviewed frequently (at least monthly or more often if needed). The review asks: “Is this still necessary? Can we safely reduce this restriction now?” For residents under DoLS, the conditions of the authorisation (if any) will be followed, and progress made toward enabling more freedom if possible. For instance, if a resident had a phase of confusion after a hospital stay and couldn’t go out safely (hence a DoLS in place with the front door locked), but later improves, the home will reassess capacity and may decide to remove the restriction (and inform the authority to lift the DoLS). The aim is always to restore full freedom of movement to the individual whenever feasible.
Involving Service Users and Representatives: Even when a person lacks capacity, they will be involved as much as possible in discussions about locks and safety. We explain measures in simple terms and reassure them (for example, a resident with dementia may be told “This door has a code so staff can keep you safe, but don’t worry, we will help you go out for walks every day after breakfast,” etc.). Families or legally appointed representatives (such as those with Power of Attorney or DoLS Relevant Person’s Representative) will be consulted and kept informed about any locking measures. Their input is valuable in knowing the person’s likely wishes and in suggesting creative alternatives that might avoid the need for restrictive measures.

Staff Responsibilities

All care home staff must understand and implement this policy consistently:

Management: The Registered Manager is responsible for ensuring that all staff are aware of this Locking Doors Policy and for training them in its application. Management will include discussions of door-locking practices in staff inductions and ongoing training, especially around privacy, dignity, and DoLS. The Manager also ensures risk assessments and capacity assessments are carried out when needed, and that DoLS authorisations are applied for in a timely manner when indicated. CIW notifications related to DoLS (or any incidents related to door locking) will be completed by management.
Care Staff: Care assistants and nurses should always respect residents’ choices regarding locked doors. They must perform checks (e.g. nightly safety rounds) in a manner that adheres to this policy – knocking and waiting for consent to enter, using emergency access only when justified. Staff allocated master keys must keep them secure and not misuse them. If a staff member has concerns (for example, a resident repeatedly forgets their key or another resident seems distressed about a locked door), they should report this so the care plan can be adjusted. Care staff also document whenever they have to use a master key for entry (to maintain transparency and so any pattern can be reviewed).
Health and Safety Officer/Maintenance: The maintenance team ensures that all locks and security systems are functioning correctly. They will do regular checks on bedroom door locks (making sure they open properly from inside and that staff keys work from outside). They will also test external door mechanisms and alarms. Any defective lock or security device must be repaired promptly, and interim measures taken to maintain security (e.g. a staff member posted by a broken door) until fixed.
Training: Staff will receive training in understanding the Mental Capacity Act and DoLS in relation to restrictions like locked doors. They will also be trained in de-escalation and alternative strategies so that locking a person in is never seen as the first solution. This training will be refreshed periodically, especially if there are changes in legislation (for example, if Liberty Protection Safeguards replace DoLS in the future). The policy will be included in annual competency assessments – e.g., spot checks may include asking a staff member how they would handle a scenario where a resident wants to leave, etc.

Compliance and Quality Assurance

Compliance with this policy is monitored through internal audits and care plan reviews. The manager or a designated senior will periodically audit a sample of rooms to ensure locks are in place and being used appropriately (e.g. check that residents who want keys have them, and that staff can access locks in emergency). They will also review incident logs for any issues related to door locking (for example, a resident found wandering outside – indicating a possible lapse in security, or a resident upset about inability to access their room – indicating a policy review need).

The policy is aligned with CIW’s inspection criteria. CIW inspectors may check that bedroom doors have appropriate locks with resident access and emergency staff access, and that any locked-unit practices do not amount to unlawful deprivations of liberty. We will fully cooperate with regulatory inspections, providing evidence of risk assessments and DoLS authorisations where applicable.

Any breach of this policy (such as a staff member locking a competent resident in a room against their will, or failing to secure an external door leading to an elopement incident) will be investigated under the home’s disciplinary procedures and safeguarding protocols. Remedial actions will be taken to prevent recurrence.

Policy Review

This policy will be reviewed at least annually, or sooner if there are changes in legislation/guidance (for example, implementation of Liberty Protection Safeguards, changes in CIW regulations) or if an audit/incident suggests that updates are needed. Reviews will involve gathering feedback from service users and families on how the locking policy is working in practice. Any revisions will be approved by the Registered Manager and communicated to all staff, and training will be provided on new provisions as necessary.

References: Relevant guidance and regulations that inform this policy include CIW statutory guidance (e.g. requirements for bedroom door locks and security), the Mental Capacity Act 2005 Code of Practice, and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards Code of Practice. Notably, Welsh law (Regulation 31 under the Regulation and Inspection of Social Care (Wales) Act) prohibits depriving a service user of liberty without due legal process. The policy has been written with these in mind to ensure that the care home’s practices around locked doors uphold residents’ rights, safety, and legal protections.

Responsible Person: {{org_field_registered_manager_first_name}} {{org_field_registered_manager_last_name}}
Reviewed on: {{last_update_date}}
Next Review Date: {{next_review_date}}
Copyright © {{current_year}} – {{org_field_name}}. All rights reserved.