{{org_field_logo}}
{{org_field_name}}
Registration Number: {{org_field_registration_no}}
Restrictive Practices and Physical Interventions Policy
1. Purpose
The purpose of this policy is to set out the arrangements at {{org_field_name}} for preventing, reducing, authorising, using, recording, reporting, monitoring and reviewing restrictive practices and physical interventions. The service is committed to providing care and support in a person-centred, rights-based and least restrictive manner and to reducing the use of restrictive practices wherever possible.
Restrictive practices must not be used routinely, for convenience, as a substitute for appropriate staffing, because of resource difficulties, as a punishment, to humiliate or degrade an individual, or as a means of securing compliance where there is no lawful justification for the restriction.
Any act intended to control or restrain an individual must comply with Regulation 29 of the Regulated Services (Service Providers and Responsible Individuals) (Wales) Regulations 2017, as amended. Control or restraint may only be used where:
- it is necessary to prevent a risk of harm to the individual or another individual;
- it is a proportionate response to that risk;
- the least restrictive effective response is used;
- the individual’s needs, wishes, feelings, communication needs and relevant risks have been considered;
- there is a lawful basis for the intervention; and
- where control or restraint is used, it is carried out by staff who are trained and competent in the particular method used.
This policy must be read and applied in accordance with:
- the Regulation and Inspection of Social Care (Wales) Act 2016;
- the Regulated Services (Service Providers and Responsible Individuals) (Wales) Regulations 2017, as amended, in particular Regulations 12, 21, 26–32, 59, 60 and 77–80;
- the Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014;
- the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and its Code of Practice;
- the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards and the applicable Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards Code of Practice;
- the Human Rights Act 1998 and the rights protected by the European Convention on Human Rights, including Articles 3, 5 and 8 where relevant;
- the Equality Act 2010;
- the Welsh Government Reducing Restrictive Practices Framework;
- the Wales Safeguarding Procedures; and
- current Care Inspectorate Wales requirements and guidance.
For adults in care homes, the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards remain the applicable statutory authorisation process where care arrangements amount, or may amount, to a deprivation of liberty and the relevant legal requirements are met. Liberty Protection Safeguards must not be treated as the operative authorisation system unless and until they are brought into force and replace the existing arrangements.
The service will ensure that restrictive practices are reduced as far as reasonably possible through person-centred planning, positive approaches to behaviour, trauma-informed practice where appropriate, effective communication, environmental adjustments, meaningful engagement, positive risk management and appropriate de-escalation.
The aims of this policy are to:
- protect the rights, dignity, safety and well-being of individuals;
- prevent and reduce the use of restrictive practices;
- ensure that any restriction is lawful, necessary and proportionate;
- ensure that restrictive practices are never used as punishment or for the convenience of staff;
- ensure that planned restrictions are based on individual assessment and are clearly documented in the individual’s personal plan and associated risk assessments;
- ensure that any unplanned restrictive intervention results in appropriate review;
- ensure that all incidents of control or restraint are recorded within the statutory timescale;
- ensure that safeguarding and CIW notifications are made where the applicable criteria are met;
- ensure that restrictive-practice information is monitored and analysed as part of the service’s governance and quality-of-care arrangements; and
- ensure that staff have the knowledge, skills, training and competence required for their role.
2. Scope
This policy applies to all employees, agency staff, and volunteers at {{org_field_name}}, service users receiving care and support, visitors, including family members, advocates, and external professionals, and management and safeguarding leads responsible for oversight and reporting.
This policy covers the definition of restrictive practices, positive behaviour support strategies, risk assessments and individual care planning, authorised use of physical interventions, reporting and monitoring, and staff training and competency requirements.
3. Definition of Restrictive Practices
For the purposes of this policy, a restrictive practice is any action, arrangement or intervention that restricts an individual’s rights, freedom of movement, autonomy, choice or control over their daily life.
Under Regulation 29 of the Regulated Services (Service Providers and Responsible Individuals) (Wales) Regulations 2017, a person controls or restrains an individual where that person:
- uses, or threatens to use, force to secure the doing of an act which the individual resists; or
- restricts the individual’s liberty of movement, whether or not the individual resists, including by physical, mechanical or chemical means.
Restrictive practices may include, but are not limited to:
- Physical restraint or physical intervention – direct physical contact intended to restrict, control or prevent an individual’s movement.
- Mechanical restraint – the use of equipment or a device to prevent, restrict or control movement where its purpose or effect is restrictive. Equipment legitimately used for therapeutic, postural or safety purposes must nevertheless be considered carefully where it also restricts movement.
- Chemical restraint – the use of medication principally to control or restrict behaviour or movement rather than to treat an identified clinical condition in accordance with an appropriate prescribing and treatment plan.
- Environmental restraint – restrictions created through the physical environment, including locked doors, barriers, restricted areas or arrangements that prevent an individual from freely accessing or leaving an area.
- Surveillance-related restrictions – monitoring arrangements which restrict privacy, autonomy or freedom and which therefore require an appropriate lawful and proportionate basis.
- Social or psychological restraint and coercion – the use of threats, intimidation, coercive language, controlling communication or other psychological pressure to restrict an individual’s choices or actions. Coercion must not be used as a substitute for lawful, person-centred care.
- Blanket restrictions – rules or restrictions applied to a group of individuals regardless of each person’s assessed needs, wishes, capacity, risks or circumstances. Blanket restrictions must not be imposed simply for staff convenience or organisational routine.
- Seclusion – the supervised confinement of an individual away from others in a place which the individual is prevented from leaving of their own free will.
- Long-term or continuous restrictions – ongoing arrangements which cumulatively restrict an individual’s liberty, choice, movement, contact with others or access to activities or facilities.
Practices described by other terms, including “time out”, “quiet time”, “safe space”, “observation”, “monitoring”, “guidance” or “support”, must be treated as restrictive practices where their actual purpose or effect is to prevent an individual from doing something they wish to do, require them to do something they do not wish to do, or restrict their freedom of movement or autonomy.
The name given to an intervention does not determine whether it is restrictive. Staff must consider its actual purpose, effect and impact on the individual.
Restrictive practices must never be used:
- as punishment;
- to humiliate, degrade, intimidate or deliberately cause pain;
- solely to secure compliance;
- because of staff shortages;
- because of inadequate staff skill or training;
- because of resource or environmental difficulties that could reasonably be addressed; or
- for the convenience of staff or the service.
4. Preventing and Reducing Restrictive Practices
{{org_field_name}} will adopt a proactive, person-centred and rights-based approach designed to prevent and reduce the circumstances in which restrictive practices may become necessary.
Staff must seek to understand the reasons for an individual’s distress, behaviour or communication and must not assume that behaviour which challenges the service is, in itself, justification for restriction.
Preventative approaches will include, where relevant:
- understanding the individual’s communication style, needs, preferences, wishes and feelings;
- identifying factors which may cause distress, anxiety, pain, fear or frustration;
- Positive Behaviour Support or another appropriate evidence-based person-centred framework;
- trauma-informed approaches where relevant to the individual;
- providing meaningful choice and control;
- using communication methods appropriate to the individual;
- making reasonable environmental adjustments;
- maintaining predictable and person-centred routines where these are important to the individual;
- providing meaningful occupation, engagement and activity;
- responding to physical health, pain, sensory, emotional and mental health needs;
- using appropriate de-escalation, distraction, active listening, redirection and other non-restrictive responses; and
- identifying and addressing organisational practices or blanket rules which unnecessarily restrict individuals.
Restrictive practices may only be used where they are lawful, necessary to prevent a risk of harm to the individual or another individual, and proportionate to that risk. The least restrictive effective intervention must be used for no longer than necessary.
Restrictive practices must not be used simply because other approaches have not produced the outcome preferred by staff. The justification must always relate to the prevention of harm and must meet the applicable legal requirements.
5. Risk Assessment, Consent, Mental Capacity and Individual Planning
Where there is a foreseeable possibility that restrictive practice may be required, the service must undertake and document an individualised assessment before planned restrictive practice is used.
The assessment must consider:
- the nature and likelihood of the identified harm;
- the potential seriousness of the harm;
- the individual’s needs, preferences, wishes and feelings;
- the individual’s communication needs;
- relevant physical and mental health needs;
- the individual’s history, including trauma where known and relevant;
- any protected characteristics and relevant cultural or religious considerations;
- potential triggers and preventative strategies;
- non-restrictive and less restrictive alternatives;
- the risks created by the proposed intervention itself;
- the environment in which an intervention may occur;
- the individual’s capacity in relation to the relevant decision;
- whether the individual is consenting to the proposed arrangements;
- the legal authority relied upon where the individual cannot give the relevant valid consent;
- how the individual will be monitored during and after any restrictive intervention;
- circumstances requiring medical assessment or treatment; and
- how the restriction will be reduced, reviewed and, wherever possible, discontinued.
Any intended or foreseeable restrictive practice must be clearly described in the individual’s personal plan and, where relevant, their behaviour support plan. The plan must identify the circumstances in which the intervention may be used, preventative and de-escalation strategies, the least restrictive response, relevant risks, monitoring requirements and the arrangements for reducing the restriction.
Restrictive practices must not be authorised through generic statements such as “restraint as required” or “physical intervention if necessary”. The personal plan must contain sufficient individualised detail to guide staff safely and lawfully.
Any use of restrictive practice which was not anticipated or provided for in the individual’s existing plan must result in an appropriate and timely review of the incident, the risks, the individual’s needs and the personal plan.
The personal plan must be reviewed in accordance with Regulation 16 of the Regulated Services (Service Providers and Responsible Individuals) (Wales) Regulations 2017, including whenever required and at least every three months. Where applicable, that review must take account of the most recent records relating to control, restraint and restrictive practice.
5.1 Mental Capacity, Consent and Best Interests
Staff must comply with the principles and requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 whenever an individual’s capacity is relevant to a proposed restriction or care arrangement.
Capacity must be considered in relation to the particular decision at the time it needs to be made. A person must not be treated as unable to make a decision merely because the decision appears unwise.
Where an individual lacks capacity to make the relevant decision, any act carried out under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 must be in the individual’s best interests and must comply with the statutory requirements concerning restraint, including necessity and proportionality where applicable.
A best-interests decision does not, by itself, provide authority for a deprivation of liberty. Where care arrangements amount or may amount to a deprivation of liberty, appropriate lawful authorisation must be obtained.
5.2 Deprivation of Liberty
An individual must not be deprived of their liberty for the purpose of receiving care and support without lawful authority.
For adults aged 18 or over receiving care in a care home, the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards remain the applicable statutory authorisation process where the arrangements amount to a deprivation of liberty and the relevant criteria are met.
Following the UK Supreme Court judgment of 2 June 2026, staff and managers must not rely solely on the former Cheshire West “acid test” when deciding whether care arrangements amount to a deprivation of liberty.
Whether an individual is deprived of their liberty must instead be assessed on the individual circumstances of the case. Relevant factors include:
- the type and nature of restrictions;
- the duration of the restrictions;
- the effect of the restrictions on the individual;
- the manner in which the restrictions are implemented;
- whether and how the individual objects;
- the individual’s wishes and feelings;
- the relative normality of the arrangements in the individual’s circumstances;
- the extent to which the arrangements resemble detention; and
- the purpose and overall circumstances of the arrangements.
No single factor is determinative.
The individual’s wishes and feelings must be actively established. Compliance must not automatically be treated as consent. Staff must consider verbal and non-verbal communication, behaviour, attempts to leave, resistance to care, distress and previously expressed wishes and feelings.
Where there is doubt about whether the individual is objecting, whether they can validly consent to the arrangements, or whether the restrictions amount to a deprivation of liberty, the matter must be escalated promptly to the Registered Manager and referred to the relevant local authority or other appropriate legal route for consideration.
6. Use of Physical Interventions
6.1 Circumstances in Which Physical Intervention May Be Used
A physical intervention or other form of control or restraint may only be used where:
- it is necessary to prevent a risk of harm to the individual or another individual;
- it is proportionate to the nature, likelihood and seriousness of that risk;
- the intervention used is the least restrictive effective response reasonably available in the circumstances;
- it is used for the shortest period necessary;
- there is a lawful basis for the intervention;
- the individual’s known needs and relevant risks are taken into account; and
- the member of staff using the intervention has been trained and assessed as competent in the particular method used, except where immediate action that is otherwise lawful is unavoidably required in an unforeseen emergency.
Where the situation allows, staff must use preventative, de-escalation and less restrictive approaches before physical intervention.
Staff must continually assess whether the intervention remains necessary. The intervention must cease as soon as the justification for using it no longer exists.
Physical intervention must never be used:
- as punishment or discipline;
- to humiliate, intimidate or degrade an individual;
- to deliberately inflict pain;
- solely to obtain compliance;
- because an individual is verbally challenging without a corresponding risk of harm;
- because of staff shortages or inadequate staffing arrangements;
- because of resource difficulties;
- for the convenience of staff; or
- for longer than is necessary.
6.2 Methods of Physical Intervention
{{org_field_name}} does not give blanket authorisation through this policy for particular holds or restraint techniques.
Where the foreseeable use of a specific physical intervention forms part of an individual’s support arrangements:
- the need for the intervention must be based on an individual assessment;
- the intervention must be described in sufficient detail in the relevant personal plan or behaviour support plan;
- risks and contraindications must be assessed;
- the intervention must be consistent with the training and competence of the staff expected to use it;
- the method must be the least restrictive option capable of safely addressing the identified risk;
- arrangements for observation and monitoring during the intervention must be identified; and
- the plan must identify how the need for the intervention will be reviewed and reduced.
Staff must not improvise restraint techniques or use techniques in which they have not been appropriately trained.
The following are prohibited:
- restraint intended to cause pain;
- pain-compliance techniques;
- deliberate pressure to the neck or throat;
- any intervention that intentionally interferes with breathing or circulation;
- deliberate pressure to the chest, abdomen or other area in a manner that compromises breathing;
- corporal punishment;
- restraint used as punishment, retaliation, intimidation or humiliation; and
- any other technique prohibited by applicable legislation, national guidance or the service’s approved training arrangements.
Any physical intervention that causes or may have caused injury, breathing difficulty, loss of consciousness, significant distress or an unexpected deterioration in the individual’s condition must be stopped as soon as safely possible and appropriate medical assistance obtained without delay.
7. Recording, Reporting, Notification and Post-Incident Review
7.1 Immediate Actions Following Restrictive Practice
Following any restrictive intervention, staff must:
- ensure that the restriction ends as soon as it is no longer necessary;
- check the immediate physical and emotional well-being of the individual;
- obtain medical advice, assessment or emergency treatment where required;
- check the well-being of other individuals, staff or persons affected by the incident;
- inform the person in charge or Registered Manager in accordance with the service’s incident-reporting arrangements;
- preserve relevant evidence where a safeguarding concern, injury, allegation or potential criminal offence is involved; and
- provide appropriate post-incident support.
The individual must be offered appropriate support following the incident. This must take account of their communication needs, wishes, emotional state, possible trauma and ability to participate.
7.2 Recording Requirements
Every incident in which control or restraint is used must be recorded. A record of the incident must be made within 24 hours, as required by Regulation 29(4).
The fact that a restrictive practice is already authorised or anticipated within an individual’s personal plan does not remove the requirement to record its actual use.
The record must provide sufficient information to enable review of the individual’s care and support and organisational monitoring. It must include, as applicable:
- the individual’s name;
- the date, time and location of the incident;
- circumstances and events leading to the intervention;
- known triggers or contributing factors;
- preventative and de-escalation approaches attempted, where applicable;
- the reason the restrictive intervention was considered necessary;
- the risk of harm being addressed;
- the type of restrictive practice or intervention used;
- the names and roles of staff involved;
- the duration of the restriction;
- how the individual was monitored throughout;
- the individual’s response;
- any injury, pain, distress or other physical or psychological effect;
- any injury or effect on other persons;
- any medical assessment, treatment or other healthcare intervention required;
- when and why the intervention ended;
- the individual’s wishes, feelings and account of the incident where these can be obtained;
- post-incident support provided;
- whether the personal plan or risk assessment requires review;
- whether a safeguarding referral was required and, if so, details of the referral;
- whether a CIW or other statutory notification was required and, if so, when it was made;
- whether the police or another agency was involved;
- whether relevant representatives, family members, commissioners or professionals were informed in accordance with the individual’s circumstances and personal plan; and
- the outcome of the subsequent review and action required to reduce the likelihood of recurrence.
The service must also maintain the records required by Regulation 59 and Schedule 2, including the date and circumstances of measures of control or restraint used on an individual.
7.3 Safeguarding
Where restrictive practice may constitute abuse, neglect, improper treatment, unlawful restraint or inappropriate deprivation of liberty, staff must act immediately in accordance with the service’s safeguarding policy and the Wales Safeguarding Procedures.
Any indication that restrictive practice has been used inappropriately must be treated as a safeguarding concern and referred in accordance with applicable safeguarding procedures.
Any injury sustained as a result of restrictive practice must be considered and reported in accordance with the service’s safeguarding procedures and current Welsh Government requirements.
Where there is an allegation or evidence of abuse, neglect or improper treatment, the service provider must:
- take immediate action to ensure the safety of individuals;
- make appropriate referrals to relevant agencies; and
- retain a record of the allegation or evidence, action taken and referrals made.
This mirrors Regulation 27.
7.4 Notifications to Care Inspectorate Wales
Restrictive practice is not automatically notifiable to CIW simply because it has occurred. The Registered Manager must consider whether the circumstances fall within a prescribed notifiable event under the Regulated Services (Service Providers and Responsible Individuals) (Wales) Regulations 2017, as amended.
Where a prescribed event has occurred, the service provider must notify CIW without delay and in writing unless a different timescale is specifically prescribed, using CIW Online and the form or process required by CIW.
Relevant circumstances may include:
- abuse or an allegation of abuse involving the service provider, a member of staff or a volunteer;
- an allegation of misconduct by a member of staff;
- a serious accident or injury meeting the applicable notification criteria;
- an incident reported to the police;
- an event which prevents or could prevent the service from continuing to be provided safely; and
- a request made to the supervisory body in relation to the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards.
Every DoLS request/application which falls within the applicable CIW notification requirement must be notified through CIW Online. This applies whether the application is subsequently authorised or not.
CIW currently confirms that registered adult care homes must notify it of each DoLS application and that notifications are made through CIW Online.
7.5 Post-Incident Support and Review
Following restrictive practice, the individual must be offered person-centred post-incident support appropriate to their needs and circumstances.
Post-incident support must be distinguished from the subsequent learning review. Immediate support should focus on physical and emotional well-being and restoring safety.
A learning review must consider, as appropriate:
- what occurred before, during and after the incident;
- the individual’s account, wishes and feelings;
- whether communication, health, environmental or other unmet needs contributed;
- whether staff followed the individual’s personal plan and this policy;
- whether the intervention was necessary and proportionate;
- whether a less restrictive approach could reasonably have been used;
- whether staff training or competence requires review;
- whether the intervention caused harm or distress;
- whether safeguarding action is required;
- whether the personal plan, behaviour support plan or risk assessment requires amendment; and
- what measures will be taken to prevent or reduce future restrictive practice.
Where an unplanned restrictive intervention has occurred, the individual’s assessment and personal plan must be reviewed promptly to determine whether changes are required.
The individual must be involved in the review as far as possible. Relevant representatives and professionals must also be involved where appropriate and lawful.
8. Staff Training, Competence and Responsibilities
8.1 Training and Competence
All staff must receive training appropriate to their role which enables them to understand the service’s approach to preventing and reducing restrictive practices.
Relevant induction and ongoing learning must include, according to role:
- person-centred and rights-based care;
- the prevention and reduction of restrictive practices;
- relevant human rights principles;
- the Mental Capacity Act 2005;
- Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards where relevant to the role;
- the current legal framework for identifying a possible deprivation of liberty;
- communication and individualised approaches;
- understanding distress and behaviour;
- trauma-informed approaches where relevant;
- Positive Behaviour Support or other appropriate preventative frameworks;
- de-escalation and non-restrictive interventions;
- safeguarding and whistleblowing responsibilities;
- recognising inappropriate or unlawful restrictive practices;
- recording and reporting requirements; and
- post-incident support and learning.
Staff must not receive physical-intervention training merely as a blanket requirement where their role and the assessed needs of individuals do not indicate that they may need to use such interventions.
Where staff may reasonably be expected to use a particular restrictive physical intervention as a last resort, they must receive appropriate competence-based training in that method before using it. Prevention and de-escalation training must form part of the overall training approach.
The service provider must ensure that:
- training is appropriate to the needs of individuals using the service;
- staff competence is assessed and maintained;
- training and competence are reviewed following significant incidents, concerns, changes in individuals’ needs or changes to legislation or national guidance;
- refresher training is provided at intervals required by the approved training programme, assessed staff need, organisational policy and relevant guidance;
- agency and bank staff are subject to equivalent requirements where they may be required to use restrictive practices; and
- training records and evidence of competence are maintained.
Staff must never use a planned restrictive intervention for which they have not been appropriately trained and assessed as competent.
8.2 Staff Responsibilities
All staff must:
- promote dignity, autonomy, choice and the least restrictive approach;
- follow the individual’s current personal plan, behaviour support plan and risk assessments;
- use preventative and de-escalation strategies wherever appropriate;
- recognise when an everyday practice or organisational rule may constitute a restriction;
- use control or restraint only where the legal criteria are met;
- stop a restrictive intervention as soon as it is no longer necessary;
- monitor the individual throughout any restrictive intervention;
- seek medical assistance where required;
- report and record all incidents in accordance with this policy;
- raise safeguarding concerns where restrictive practice is inappropriate, excessive, unlawful or abusive;
- report concerns about staff practice through safeguarding, management and whistleblowing arrangements as appropriate;
- participate in post-incident learning and review;
- identify where an individual’s plan requires review; and
- maintain the knowledge and competence necessary for their role.
9. Governance, Audit and Reduction of Restrictive Practices
The Registered Manager and Responsible Individual must ensure that effective systems are in place to monitor, review and reduce the use of restrictive practices within the service.
The service must maintain sufficient information to enable patterns, trends, risks and areas for improvement to be identified.
Monitoring must include, as applicable:
- the number and type of restrictive interventions used;
- the individuals affected;
- reasons for their use;
- frequency and duration;
- location and time of incidents;
- injuries or adverse physical or psychological effects;
- safeguarding concerns and referrals;
- CIW and other statutory notifications;
- whether interventions were planned or unplanned;
- whether interventions were consistent with personal plans and risk assessments;
- whether staff using an intervention had the required training and competence;
- the individual’s involvement in post-incident review;
- action taken following incidents;
- recurrence of incidents;
- progress in reducing restrictions; and
- any patterns which may indicate disproportionate impact on individuals sharing a protected characteristic.
The Registered Manager must ensure that restrictive-practice records are audited regularly and that concerns are acted upon without delay.
The Responsible Individual must ensure that records relating to control, restraint and restrictive practice are considered as part of the service’s systems for monitoring, reviewing and improving the quality and safety of care and support.
Aggregated information concerning restrictive practices must inform the quality-of-care review required by Regulation 80, including identification of patterns, trends, safeguarding risks, lessons learned and opportunities to reduce restrictive practice.
Where monitoring identifies repeated or increasing restrictive practice for an individual, the Registered Manager must ensure that the individual’s needs, risks, personal plan and behaviour support arrangements are reviewed and that specialist advice is sought where appropriate.
Where monitoring identifies organisational practices, blanket restrictions, environmental factors, staffing arrangements or other systemic issues contributing to restrictive practice, corrective action must be taken.
The service’s objective must be demonstrable reduction of unnecessary restrictive practices while maintaining the safety and well-being of individuals and others.
10. Related Policies
This policy must be read alongside, where applicable:
- Safeguarding Adults from Abuse, Neglect and Improper Treatment Policy;
- Mental Capacity and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards Policy;
- Positive Behaviour Support/Behaviour Support Policy;
- Risk Management and Assessment Policy;
- Personal Planning/Care Planning Policy;
- Incident Reporting and Investigation Policy;
- Medication Management Policy;
- Safeguarding Policy;
- Whistleblowing Policy;
- Complaints Policy;
- Staff Training, Support and Development Policy;
- Duty of Candour Policy; and
- any other service-specific policy relevant to restrictive practice.
Where there is any conflict between a local procedure and current legislation or statutory requirements, the applicable legal requirement must take precedence and the policy must be reviewed without delay.
11. Policy Review
This policy will be reviewed at least annually and sooner where required because of:
- a change in legislation or case law;
- revised Welsh Government or CIW guidance;
- changes to the Welsh Government Reducing Restrictive Practices Framework or associated national guidance;
- changes to Mental Capacity Act or deprivation-of-liberty requirements;
- learning from safeguarding matters, complaints, incidents or investigations;
- findings from CIW inspection or other regulatory activity;
- findings from audits or quality-of-care reviews;
- an incident indicating that the policy may not adequately protect individuals; or
- changes to the statement of purpose or the needs of individuals using the service.
The Responsible Individual must ensure that suitable arrangements are in place to keep this policy up to date and to ensure that staff and volunteers have access to, understand and follow the policy.
Where the policy is amended, relevant staff must be informed of the changes and additional training or competency assessment must be provided where necessary.
Responsible Person: {{org_field_registered_manager_first_name}} {{org_field_registered_manager_last_name}}
Reviewed on: {{last_update_date}}
Next Review Date: {{next_review_date}}
Copyright © {{current_year}} – {{org_field_name}}. All rights reserved.