{{org_field_logo}}
{{org_field_name}}
Registration Number: {{org_field_registration_no}}
Mental Capacity and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) Policy
1. Introduction
Our Home Care business is committed to ensuring that the rights of individuals who may lack mental capacity are respected and upheld in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). We ensure that all service users are supported in making decisions about their care and that any restrictions to their freedom are legally authorised. This policy applies to all staff and is designed to ensure compliance with Care Inspectorate Wales (CIW) regulations, the Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014, and Social Care Wales (SCW) Code of Practice.
This policy provides guidance on how we manage Mental Capacity Assessments and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) effectively and fairly, ensuring the well-being, dignity, and rights of all service users. It also serves as a compliance guide for CIW inspectors.
The Liberty Protection Safeguards are intended to replace DoLS but are not currently in force. We will update this policy promptly when the legal framework changes; the UK Government announced a further consultation on LPS in 2026.
2. Scope, definitions and settings (MCA / DoLS / community deprivation of liberty)
This policy applies to all staff providing domiciliary support, including care delivered in a person’s own home and (where commissioned) in supported living/extra care settings.
Mental capacity is decision-specific. We apply the statutory principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and complete a capacity assessment where there is reason to doubt capacity in relation to a specific decision.
Restriction vs restraint vs deprivation of liberty:
- A restriction may limit choice or movement (e.g., supervision, prompts, environmental controls).
- Restraint may include physical, mechanical or chemical restraint and must be proportionate, necessary and the least restrictive option, and recorded in line with our restrictive practice procedures. (This links directly to Regulation 29 expectations on restraint/restrictive practice and recording.)
- A deprivation of liberty may occur where a person who lacks the relevant capacity is under continuous supervision and control and not free to leave (the “acid test”). Where this may be the case, we must ensure lawful authority is in place before care arrangements continue.
Correct legal route depends on setting:
- DoLS applies to adults in care homes and hospitals who lack capacity to consent to the arrangements.
- In community settings (including a person’s own home and many supported living arrangements), deprivation of liberty must normally be authorised by the Court of Protection.
3. Key Principles of Mental Capacity and DoLS Management
- Presumption of Capacity: Every individual is presumed to have the capacity to make decisions unless it is proven otherwise.
- Support to Make Decisions: Service users must be given appropriate support to make decisions, considering their ability to understand and retain information.
- Best Interests: Any decisions made on behalf of individuals lacking capacity must be in their best interests and consider their wishes, feelings, values, and beliefs.
- Least Restrictive Option: Any decision or intervention must be the least restrictive option that protects the individual’s rights and freedom.
- Safeguarding from unlawful deprivation of liberty (lawful authority required): We ensure that no person is deprived of their liberty for the purpose of receiving care and support without lawful authority. Depending on the setting and legal framework, lawful authority may be provided through DoLS (for hospitals/care homes), a Court of Protection order (for deprivation of liberty in a person’s own home/supported living and other community settings), the Mental Health Act 1983 (where applicable), or other lawful routes in rare cases. Staff must escalate immediately where restrictions may amount to a deprivation of liberty so the appropriate legal pathway is followed and recorded.
4. How We Manage Mental Capacity and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards Efficiently
A. Assessing Mental Capacity
We conduct a Mental Capacity Assessment (MCA) whenever there is doubt about a service user’s ability to make specific decisions regarding their care or treatment.
For Staff:
- Step 1: Apply the MCA two-stage test and record it:
- Is there an impairment of, or disturbance in, the functioning of the mind or brain?
- If so, does this impairment mean the person is unable to make the specific decision when needed (unable to understand, retain, use/weigh, or communicate the decision)?
- Step 2: Provide appropriate support and information to enable the individual to make an informed decision.
- Step 3: If the individual is unable to make a specific decision, a best interests decision-making process is implemented.
- Step 4: Complete a Mental Capacity Assessment (MCA) Report (MCA-R) to document findings and decisions.
For CIW Inspectors:
- MCA assessments are recorded in the Care Management System (CMS), ensuring that each decision about capacity is clearly documented.
- There is evidence that appropriate support is provided to service users to enable them to make decisions.
B. Deprivation of liberty (DoLS and community authorisation)
If a service user lacks capacity to consent to the care arrangements and the restrictions may amount to a deprivation of liberty, we act immediately to ensure lawful authority is in place in line with Regulation 31.
For Staff:
- Step 1: Identify and record restrictions and consider whether the “acid test” may be met (continuous supervision/control and not free to leave).
- Step 2: Escalate to the Registered Manager the same day where there is any indication a deprivation of liberty may be occurring or developing.
- Step 3: Pending legal advice/authorisation, ensure care remains least restrictive and proportionate, and update the care plan/risk assessment.
- Step 4: Where the person is in their own home or another community setting, the Registered Manager will notify the commissioning Local Authority (or the relevant Local Authority) and request urgent action to secure the appropriate lawful authority (normally a Court of Protection application), and will cooperate fully with professionals leading the process.
- Step 5: Where the person is in a care home or hospital setting (e.g., during a placement we support), the Registered Manager will ensure the appropriate body is informed so that DoLS authorisation is sought/managed through the correct route.
- Step 6: Reviews: restrictions and any potential deprivation of liberty are reviewed at each care plan review and immediately following any significant change or incident.
For CIW Inspectors (evidence we hold)
- Clear records of restriction/DoL screening, escalation, and the lawful authority route used (DoLS / Court order / other).
- Evidence restrictions are the least restrictive option, reviewed, and embedded in governance reporting, in line with statutory guidance expectations.
C. Control, restraint and restrictive practice (Regulation 29 link)
Any control, restraint or restrictive practice must be a last resort, proportionate, and the least restrictive option. Staff must only use techniques they are trained and competent to use. Any incident involving control or restraint must be recorded within 24 hours, escalated in line with our incident reporting process, and reviewed as part of governance and quality-of-care review.
D. Best Interests Decision-Making
When a service user lacks mental capacity to make a specific decision, we ensure that a best interests decision is made, involving relevant individuals and professionals.
For Staff:
- Identify and consult with relevant people (e.g., family members, advocates, care team, or healthcare professionals) to make decisions in the service user’s best interests.
- Document all decisions made in the service user’s Best Interests Decision Record (BIDR).
- Ensure that any decision made is the least restrictive and in the best interest of the individual.
For CIW Inspectors:
- Best interests decisions are documented and demonstrate that the person’s rights, preferences, and views were considered.
- Family involvement and consent are recorded, where appropriate.
E. Advocacy, representatives and right to challenge
Where a person lacks capacity and decisions are being made in their best interests, we identify and involve the appropriate representative (e.g., attorney under a Lasting Power of Attorney, deputy, or other authorised representative). Where required, we support referral for independent advocacy in line with statutory duties and local arrangements.
We ensure the person and/or their representative is informed (in an accessible format) of how to raise concerns and challenge restrictions or deprivation of liberty authorisations, including via the relevant legal route (e.g., Court of Protection where applicable).
F. Recording and Documentation
We ensure that all mental capacity assessments and DoLS-related records are accurately documented and easily accessible for review by managers, staff, and CIW inspectors.
For Staff:
- Complete a Mental Capacity Assessment (MCA) form for each service user who may lack capacity.
- Maintain records of DoLS referrals, assessments, and authorisations in the Care Management System (CMS).
- Keep a Best Interests Decision Record for each decision made on behalf of a service user.
For CIW Inspectors:
- All MCA, DoLS, and best interests decisions are available for inspection and demonstrate legal compliance with all relevant regulations.
- Audits confirm that records are reviewed regularly to ensure accuracy and appropriateness.
G. Staff Training and Competency in MCA and DoLS
We ensure that all staff are fully trained and competent in managing Mental Capacity and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in compliance with CIW regulations.
For Staff:
- Complete Mental Capacity Act and DoLS Training (MCAT) during induction and annual refresher training.
- Participate in case reviews and discussions on best interests decision-making and DoLS implementation.
- Ensure that any staff member involved in making capacity-related decisions is competent in legal frameworks and ethical considerations.
For CIW Inspectors:
- Training logs confirm that all relevant staff receive up-to-date training in Mental Capacity and DoLS.
- Staff appraisals ensure that competence in this area is regularly assessed and maintained.
H. Safeguarding and Reporting
If we are concerned that a service user is being unlawfully deprived of their liberty, we follow the safeguarding procedures and report the concern to the relevant authorities.
For Staff:
- Follow the Safeguarding Referral Process (SRP) if there are concerns that a service user is being deprived of liberty without proper authorisation.
- Report any suspected breach of DoLS immediately to the Registered Manager for escalation.
- Cooperate with external agencies such as the Local Authority and Safeguarding Boards if necessary.
For CIW Inspectors:
- Safeguarding logs demonstrate that concerns related to DoLS breaches are reported and investigated promptly.
- DoLS-related issues are tracked through the incident reporting system (IRS) to ensure timely resolution.
5. Governance and Continuous Improvement
We ensure high standards of mental capacity and DoLS management through regular audits, reviews, and staff training.
What We Do:
- Conduct Quarterly MCA and DoLS Audits (MDA) to monitor compliance and effectiveness.
- Hold Annual Service User and Family Feedback Sessions (ASUFS) to improve care planning and DoLS practices.
- Review and update policies and procedures regularly to reflect changes in legislation and best practice.
For CIW Inspectors:
- Audit reports demonstrate regular monitoring of MCA and DoLS processes.
- Action plans are developed and implemented based on audit findings.
6. Compliance Monitoring and Audit Procedures
- Internal Audits: Conducted quarterly to ensure compliance with CIW, MCA, and DoLS regulations.
- Annual Reviews: Full compliance check against MCA and DoLS legislation and CIW standards.
- Staff Supervisions & Appraisals: Carried out every six months to ensure ongoing staff competence in these areas.
7. Conclusion
We are committed to upholding the rights and dignity of individuals who may lack mental capacity, ensuring that all Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards are legally implemented and regularly reviewed. This policy ensures that mental capacity assessments and DoLS procedures are managed effectively, in compliance with CIW regulations, MCA 2005, and best practice guidelines.
Responsible Person: {{org_field_registered_manager_first_name}} {{org_field_registered_manager_last_name}}
Reviewed on: {{last_update_date}}
Next Review Date: {{next_review_date}}
Copyright © {{current_year}} – {{org_field_name}}. All rights reserved.